Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659321›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Cesarean Section Trends and Associated Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.

Najma Malik, Babita Kapoor, Roshani Singh, Ruma Sarkar, Imran Ahmed Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Najma MalikObstetrics and Gynecology, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur, IND.
Babita KapoorObstetrics and Gynecology, Maharshi Devraha Baba Autonomous State Medical College, Deoria, IND.
Roshani SinghObstetrics and Gynecology, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur, IND.
Ruma SarkarObstetrics and Gynecology, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur, IND.
Imran Ahmed KhanCommunity Medicine, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on women globally, and its prevalence has been rising significantly over the past few decades. CS rates have been increasing globally, raising public health concerns due to the associated financial burden and increased health risks compared to vaginal delivery. Methodology This study involves a retrospective analysis of delivery records from a tertiary care hospital in Uttar Pradesh, India, over 10 years, from January 2011 to December 2021. Results The data presented shows a significant shift in delivery methods over the past decade, particularly in the increasing rate of CS at our tertiary care center. From 2011 to 2021, the rate of CS increased from 39.6% to 52.4%. A detailed examination of the indications for primary elective CS reveals that oligohydramnios with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remained the most common indication, increasing from 31% in 2011 to 34.3% in 2021. Other significant indications include malpresentation and cephalopelvic disproportion. Conclusion The study indicates a rising trend in CS rates at the tertiary care center, with various clinical and non-clinical factors influencing this increase. The increasing rates of maternal requests for CS, both primary and repeat, point towards a shift in patient preferences and expectations. Additionally, the changing trends in indications for both elective and emergency CS highlight evolving clinical practices and an increased emphasis on maternal and fetal safety. Continuous monitoring and analysis of these trends are essential to ensure that the indications for CS are appropriately managed, balancing the benefits and risks associated with surgical deliveries.

Indexed as

cesarean sectiondecision-makingmaternal welfaretrendsvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID39659321
PMCPMC11628194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.