Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659313›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Case of Kanamycin Self-Injection for Penile Augmentation and a Literature Review of Penile Foreign Body Injections.

Muhammad Salik, Shahr Yar, Nityanandan G, Ahmed K Ibrahim

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad SalikUrology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, GBR.
Shahr YarUrology, Glangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, GBR.
Nityanandan GUrology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Ahmed K IbrahimUrology, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Hadba University College, Mosul, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injection of various substances into the penis for augmentation is an uncommon and concerning practice that can have serious consequences, such as skin necrosis, ulcers, suboptimal cosmetic results, and persistent edema, often requiring extensive surgical repair. In this article, we present a rare case of penile self-injection with Kanamycin ointment. We describe the clinical course of the disease and the management framework that was followed. Initially managed conservatively, the patient later developed voiding difficulties and skin ulcers at the injection site. Further evaluation revealed discharging sinuses and secondary ulcers. Despite initial improvement, the wounds failed to heal adequately and required specialist referral for consideration of reconstructive surgery. The injection of foreign substances into the penis, though attempted for sexual benefits, often results in dissatisfaction and requires surgical reconstruction. Close follow-up and regular physical examination are crucial to monitor disease progression and ensure appropriate, timely management. Awareness of the harms associated with the injection of foreign substances into the penis can help reduce this practice.

Indexed as

foreign body penile injectionforeign substance penile injectioninjection for penile augmentationkanamycinkanamycin penile injectionpenile injectionpenile injection literature reviewpenile self injection

Identifiers

PMID39659313
PMCPMC11628213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.