ReviewCureus2024
Increased Risk of Alzheimer's Disease With Glycemic Variability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Microstructural and Molecular Brain Changes in Early Cognitive Decline Using Multiparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Interrelationships between Refined Carbohydrates, Periodontal Diseases, and Cognitive Decline: A Narrative Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a LASSO-derived prognostic model predicting postoperative cognitive dysfunction risk in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical Aspects and Molecular Mechanisms of Cognitive Dysfunction in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Analysis of Retrospective Data From 503 Hospitalized Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes to Identify Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Combined impact of glucose variability and mineral disorders on mortality and severe cardiorenal events in critically ill CKD patients: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Vascular risk factor variability and cognitive impairment in older adults a community-based retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association Between Visit-to-Visit Glucose Variability and Brain Morphology and Cognitive Function in Type 2 Diabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that establishes a connection between fluctuations in glucose metabolism and the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Current research supports the notion that this metabolic imbalance significantly affects cognitive health. However, the specific mechanisms through which these fluctuations influence neurodegeneration, eventually leading to AD, require further exploration. This study aims to determine the risk of AD among individuals with fluctuations in blood glucose levels, with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), further providing the most recent and thorough overview of the evidence in this area. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a thorough search was carried out utilizing particular phrases in the PubMed, Elsevier, Research Gate, and Cochrane databases: ("glucose variability" or "glycemic variability" or "glucose fluctuation" or "glucose instability" or "glycemic fluctuation") and ("Alzheimer's disease" or "Alzheimer disease" or "Alzheimer dementia" or "Alzheimer"). Studies published between January 2014 to January 2024, written in English, and examining the relationship between glucose variability and AD, were included. The outcomes measured were risk of cognitive impairment and AD, cognitive performance, and risk of AD. The results of the literature search produced 142 records, with six studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Parameters for glycemic variability included fasting plasma glucose (FPG) variability, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) variability, FPG variability independent of the mean (VIM), FPG coefficient of variation (CV), and FPG standard deviation (SD). The studies revealed a positive correlation between glycemic variability and the risk of AD over time, and the findings indicated that maintaining stable glycemic levels may reduce the risk of cognitive decline among individuals with or without T2DM. Due to the small number of studies that are currently available, despite a calculated relative risk of 2.65 indicating a higher risk of AD among subjects with glycemic variability, the inclusion of the null value in the confidence interval (0.61-11.45) renders these findings not statistically significant. This comprehensive review demonstrated that, in people with or without diabetes, glycemic variability influences cognitive decline and the risk of AD. The studies demonstrated a correlation between higher fluctuations in glucose levels and an increased risk of AD, highlighting the importance of managing blood sugar levels to mitigate dementia risks. Despite these strong associations, the actual incidence rates of AD in the studied populations remained relatively low. Overall, the results were not statistically significant. Further research is recommended to explore the risk of AD among individuals with fluctuations in blood glucose levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.