ArticleESC heart failure2025
Investigation of left ventricular ejection fraction in a Swiss heart failure population: Insights into mortality and sex differences.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in patients with advanced heart failure: an analysis of the HELP-HF registry.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Temporal Evolution of the Profile of Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure (2000-2022).Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Investigation of left ventricular ejection fraction in a Swiss heart failure population: Insights into mortality and sex differences.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The impact of inflammatory burden index on the prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure: evidence from a cohort study in Jiangxi, China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsUnderstanding heart failure (HF) characteristics is essential to improve patient outcomes. Categorizing HF beyond left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is challenging due to heterogeneous clinical presentation and aetiologies. Despite global studies on HF, the role of LVEF on mortality remains controversial. We explored the association of LVEF with mortality, considering sex differences and comorbidities in a cohort from the largest tertiary cardiovascular centre in Switzerland.
methodsHF patients admitted to the University Hospital of Bern from January 2015 to December 2019 were evaluated. LVEF was used to classify patients into HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and HF with reduced preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF) categories. Cox proportional hazard models and time-stratified analyses adjusted for potential confounders were employed.
resultsA total of 5824 HF patients were included, and 2912 died over a median follow-up time of 3.39 years. Mortality rates across LVEF categories showed no significant differences, while overall, women showed significantly higher mortality; 30 day mortality was lower in the HFpEF category [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.88, P = 0.003], with persistent effects upon stratification in males (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.81, P < 0.001) and non-diabetics (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.87, P = 0.005). An isolated reduction in HFpEF mortality was observed in females after 1 year (HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98, P = 0.035).
conclusionsThe prognostic role of LVEF on all-cause mortality remains unclear, while differences in mortality rate distribution between women and men mirror established HF pathophysiological sex differences. Future HF studies should focus on HF aetiology and include measures beyond LVEF for comprehensive characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.