ArticleOral radiology2025
Evaluation of the mandibular canal and the third mandibular molar relationship by CBCT with a deep learning approach.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation of mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Segmentation of the nasopalatine canal and detection of canal furcation status with artificial intelligence on cone-beam computed tomography images.Oral radiology · 2025Article
- Exploring mandibular canal variations using CBCT: A study on clinical relevance and risk assessment.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe mandibular canal (MC) houses the inferior alveolar nerve. Extraction of the mandibular third molar (MM3) is a common dental surgery, often complicated by nerve damage. CBCT is the most effective imaging method to assess the relationship between MM3 and MC. With advancements in artificial intelligence, deep learning has shown promising results in dentistry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the MC-MM3 relationship using CBCT and a deep learning technique, as well as to automatically segment the mandibular impacted third molar, mandibular canal, mental and mandibular foramen.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed CBCT data from 300 patients. Segmentation was used for labeling, dividing the data into training (n = 270) and test (n = 30) sets. The nnU-NetV2 architecture was employed to develop an optimal deep learning model. The model's success was validated using the test set, with metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, precision, Dice score, Jaccard index, and AUC.
resultsFor the MM3 annotated on CBCT, the accuracy was 0.99, sensitivity 0.90, precision 0.85, Dice score 0.85, Jaccard index 0.78, AUC value 0.95. In MC evaluation, accuracy was 0.99, sensitivity 0.75, precision 0.78, Dice score 0.76, Jaccard index 0.62, AUC value 0.88. For the evaluation of mental foramen; accuracy 0.99, sensitivity 0.64, precision 0.66, Dice score 0.64, Jaccard index 0.57, AUC value 0.82. In the evaluation of mandibular foramen, accuracy was found to be 0.99, sensitivity 0.79, precision 0.68, Dice score 0.71, and AUC value 0.90. Evaluating the MM3-MC relationship, the model showed an 80% correlation with observer assessments.
conclusionThe nnU-NetV2 deep learning architecture reliably identifies the MC-MM3 relationship in CBCT images, aiding in diagnosis, surgical planning, and complication prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39658743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.