ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) predictive models in preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal lesions: preliminary outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Greece.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound models for assessment of ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo apply the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) predictive models, the logistic regression model 2 (LR2) and the IOTA Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX), in patients with ovarian masses and to compare their performance in preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal lesions.
methodsThis was a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study with prospectively collected data, performed between January 2019 and December 2022, in a single tertiary gynecologic oncology center in Greece. The study included women with an adnexal lesion which underwent surgery within 6 months after of using the LR2 and ADNEX protocol to assess the risk of malignancy. Correlation of the ultrasound findings with the postoperative histopathological analysis was performed. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the models to classify tumors; sensitivity and specificity were determined for each model and their performance was compared.
resultsOf the136 participants, 117 (86%) had benign ovarian masses and 19 (14%) had malignant tumors. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the LR2 model was 0.84 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), which was significantly higher than the AUC for ADNEX model: 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.89). At a cut off > 10%, the LR2 model had the highest sensitivity 89.5% (95% CI 66.9-98.7) and specificity 85.1% (95% CI 76.9-91.2) compared to ADNEX model [sensitivity 84.2% (95% CI 60.4-96.6) and specificity 71.8% (95% CI 62.7-79.7)].
conclusionsIOTA LR2 had the highest accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. IOTA LR2 and ADNEX models were both useful tools in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39658706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.