ReviewSurgical endoscopy2025
Which is the best timing for performing a cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy?
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prehabilitation Outcomes in Surgical Oncology Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a wireless intelligent endoscopic system versus a conventional wired system: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Trial
- The effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Optimal timing for cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy: insights from a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Updates in surgery · 2026Observational
- A head-mounted mixed reality platform for robotic flexible endoscope control in minimally invasive cholecystectomy: an animal feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Management of high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy: results of an international Delphi consensus study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for managing acute cholecystitis. However, in high-risk surgical patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy is frequently used either as a bridge to surgery or as definitive treatment. When employed as a bridge to surgery, the optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after cholecystostomy remains unclear.
methodsA critical review of the literature was conducted, focusing particularly on the article published by Spaniolas, et al., presented at SAGES 2024, to evaluate the optimal timing for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a cholecystostomy, according to the available evidence.
resultsThe available literature was found to be limited. The timing thresholds vary across studies, preventing a pooled evaluation of the effect size. The study by Spaniolas, et al. has several limitations, including the exclusion of subtotal cholecystectomies from the composite endpoint and the introduction of implausible variables in the logistic regression model.
conclusionIdeally, the procedure should be performed when it is least technically demanding, minimizing the need for rescue procedures (such as subtotal cholecystectomy, antegrade cholecystectomy, or conversion to open surgery) and reducing complications. This topic is increasingly relevant in clinical practice. However, the current scientific evidence remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39658671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.