ArticleNature communications2024
Automated discovery of experimental designs in super-resolution microscopy with XLuminA.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From stars to molecules: AI guided device-agnostic super-resolution imaging.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Chromatix: a differentiable, GPU-accelerated wave-optics library.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Chromatix: a differentiable, GPU-accelerated wave-optics library.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian approach towards atomically-precise localization in fluorescence microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An update on recent advances in fluorescent materials for fluorescence molecular imaging: a review.RSC advances · 2025Review
- NeuroDISK: An AI Approach to Automate Continuous Inquiry-Driven Discoveries in Neuroimaging Genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Automated discovery of experimental designs in super-resolution microscopy with XLuminA.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driven by human ingenuity and creativity, the discovery of super-resolution techniques, which circumvent the classical diffraction limit of light, represent a leap in optical microscopy. However, the vast space encompassing all possible experimental configurations suggests that some powerful concepts and techniques might have not been discovered yet, and might never be with a human-driven direct design approach. Thus, AI-based exploration techniques could provide enormous benefit, by exploring this space in a fast, unbiased way. We introduce XLuminA, an open-source computational framework developed using JAX, a high-performance computing library in Python. XLuminA offers enhanced computational speed enabled by JAX's accelerated linear algebra compiler (XLA), just-in-time compilation, and its seamlessly integrated automatic vectorization, automatic differentiation capabilities and GPU compatibility. XLuminA demonstrates a speed-up of 4 orders of magnitude compared to well-established numerical optimization methods. We showcase XLuminA's potential by re-discovering three foundational experiments in advanced microscopy, and identifying an unseen experimental blueprint featuring sub-diffraction imaging capabilities. This work constitutes an important step in AI-driven scientific discovery of new concepts in optics and advanced microscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.