Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39658544›Full record

ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025

Unlocking regeneration potential: harnessing morphogenic regulators and small peptides for enhanced plant engineering.

Christopher Youngstrom, Kan Wang, Keunsub Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher YoungstromDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Kan WangDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Keunsub LeeDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-2475

Funding

Crop Bioengineering Center, Iowa State UniversityNational Science Foundation 1917138National Science Foundation 2121410State of IowaU.S. Department of Agriculture IOW04714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genetic transformation is essential for understanding gene functions and developing improved crop varieties. Traditional methods, often genotype-dependent, are limited by plants' recalcitrance to gene delivery and low regeneration capacity. To overcome these limitations, new approaches have emerged that greatly improve efficiency and genotype flexibility. This review summarizes key strategies recently developed for plant transformation, focusing on groundbreaking technologies enhancing explant- and genotype flexibility. It covers the use of morphogenic regulators (MRs), stem cell-based methods, and in planta transformation methods. MRs, such as maize Babyboom (BBM) with Wuschel2 (WUS2), and GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORs (GRFs) with their cofactors GRF-interacting factors (GIFs), offer great potential for transforming many monocot species, including major cereal crops. Optimizing BBM/WUS2 expression cassettes has further enabled successful transformation and gene editing using seedling leaves as starting material. This technology lowers the barriers for academic laboratories to adopt monocot transformation systems. For dicot plants, tissue culture-free or in planta transformation methods, with or without the use of MRs, are emerging as more genotype-flexible alternatives to traditional tissue culture-based transformation systems. Additionally, the discovery of the local wound signal peptide Regeneration Factor 1 (REF1) has been shown to enhance transformation efficiency by activating wound-induced regeneration pathways in both monocot and dicot plants. Future research may combine these advances to develop truly genotype-independent transformation methods.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringPlant Growth RegulatorsRegenerationCrops, AgriculturalPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedTransformation, GeneticPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsAgrobacterium rhizogenesAgrobacterium tumefaciensbiolistic bombardmentcut‐dip‐buddinggenotype‐flexible transformationin planta transformationleaf transformationsomatic embryogenesistissue culture‐free transformation

Identifiers

PMID39658544
PMCPMC11771577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.