ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2024
Appraisal of current surgical guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease using the AGREE-S instrument: A scoping review.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Appraisal of current surgical guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease using the AGREE-S instrument: A scoping review.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimGuidelines play a crucial role in improving patient care by providing clinicians with up to date evidence-based recommendations. A vast number of guidelines exist on the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this scoping review was to identify current surgical IBD guidelines, assess their quality and identify areas of variation between the existing guidelines.
methodA systematic search of the literature from January 2008 to September 2023 was conducted. After identifying eligible guidelines, they were assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for Surgical Interventions (AGREE-S) instrument. Data were extracted on descriptive guideline characteristics and recommendations.
resultsFifteen guidelines were identified globally. Most guidelines were published between 2011 and 2023, with six focusing solely on Crohn's disease, five on ulcerative colitis and four on both. Six guidelines focused exclusively on surgical management, while nine contained both medical and surgical recommendations. The overall mean AGREE-S score was 59%, with more recent guidelines scoring higher.
conclusionsThe quality of IBD surgical guidelines varies considerably. High-quality, collaborative, international guidelines are needed to reduce duplication and ensure consistent, evidence-based surgical care for IBD patients worldwide. Future guideline development should adhere to the AGREE-S criteria to enhance methodological rigour and transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.