ArticleTree physiology2025
Contrasting the soil-plant hydraulics of beech and spruce by linking root water uptake to transpiration dynamics.
Article in Tree physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forest under stress: responses and recovery of water relations across scales during the compound drought in summer 2022.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- The interplay between hydraulic capacitance and stomatal regulation strategy affects soil-plant hydraulics and transpiration.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Delayed uptake and intra-tree distribution of 2H-labeled irrigation water after repeated experimental summer drought in mature spruce compared with beech.Tree physiology · 2026Article
- Monitoring plant moisture content and optimizing irrigation prescriptions based on UAV multimodal data.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tree water status is mainly determined by the amount of water taken up from roots and lost through leaves by transpiration. Variations in transpiration and stomatal conductance are often related to atmospheric conditions and leaf water potential. Yet, few experimental datasets exist that enable to relate leaf water potential, transpiration dynamics and temporal variation of root water uptake from different depths during soil drying. Here we explored the soil-plant hydraulic system using field measurements of water potentials and fluxes in soils, roots, stems and leaves of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) trees. Spruce maintained less negative water potentials than beech during soil drying, reflecting a more stringent stomatal control. While root water uptake depths were similar between species, water potentials in plant tissues of spruce were rather constant and less correlated across roots and the stem, possibly because of large water storage and hydraulic capacitance in these tissues. Root water uptake from deep soil layers increased during dry periods, particularly for beech. Our data suggest that species-specific root hydraulic conductance, capacitance and water uptake strategy are linked and affect transpiration dynamics. Thus, it is important to include such species-specific hydraulics when predicting transpiration rates based on plant water status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.