ArticleBMJ open2024
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in mechanical ventilation in the ICU: a protocol for systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of remimazolam besylate and dexmedetomidine on stress response and immune balance in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRemimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that allosterically modulates γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors to induce sedative effects. Remimazolam was approved by China for procedural sedation in 2020. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients frequently exhibit impaired liver and renal function as well as haemodynamic instability; thus, the pharmacokinetic properties of remimazolam may offer advantages for ICU sedation. A comprehensive evaluation of the relevant studies warrants further discussion. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel intravenous anaesthetic remimazolam with that of commonly used anaesthetics in the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following databases will be searched: Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CNKI and WanFang to retrieve relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This protocol was developed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2020. RCTs about the use of remimazolam for sedation during ICU mechanical ventilation will be included. Two investigators will independently screen articles and extract data according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following a qualitative evaluation of each study, data analysis will be conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software. The planned start and end dates for the study were placed on 1 June 2024 and 31 October 2024, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol for the systematic evaluation and meta-analysis does not involve individual patient data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This will be the first meta-analysis to assess the sedative efficacy and safety of remimazolam in the ICU and to provide evidence to inform clinical decision-making. The findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals relevant to the field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024554425.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.