ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Understanding relationships between epigenetic marks and their application to robust assignment of chromatin states.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traceless protein semisynthesis in cells using the promiscuous ultra-fast split intein NrdJ-1.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Traceless protein semi-synthesis in cells using the promiscuous ultra-fast split intein NrdJ-1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural changes of chromatin modulate access to DNA for the molecular machinery involved in the control of transcription. These changes are linked to variations in epigenetic marks that allow to classify chromatin in different functional states depending on the pattern of these histone marks. Importantly, alterations in chromatin states are known to be linked with various diseases, and their changes are known to explain processes such as cellular proliferation. For most of the available samples, there are not enough epigenomic data available to accurately determine chromatin states for the cells affected in each of them. This is mainly due to high costs of performing this type of experiments but also because of lack of a sufficient amount of sample or its degradation. In this work, we describe a cascade method based on a random forest algorithm to infer epigenetic marks, and by doing so, to identify relationships between different histone marks. Importantly, our approach also reduces the number of experimentally determined marks required to assign chromatin states. Moreover, in this work we have identified several relationships between patterns of different histone marks, which strengthens the evidence in favor of a redundant epigenetic code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.