ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
UPicker: a semi-supervised particle picking transformer method for cryo-EM micrographs.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CryoFSL: an annotation-efficient, few-shot learning framework for robust protein particle picking in cryo-electron microscopy micrographs.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CryoFSL: An Annotation-Efficient, Few-Shot Learning Framework for Robust Protein Particle Picking in Cryo-EM Micrographs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic single particle picking is a critical step in the data processing pipeline of cryo-electron microscopy structure reconstruction. In recent years, several deep learning-based algorithms have been developed, demonstrating their potential to solve this challenge. However, current methods highly depend on manually labeled training data, which is labor-intensive and prone to biases especially for high-noise and low-contrast micrographs, resulting in suboptimal precision and recall. To address these problems, we propose UPicker, a semi-supervised transformer-based particle-picking method with a two-stage training process: unsupervised pretraining and supervised fine-tuning. During the unsupervised pretraining, an Adaptive Laplacian of Gaussian region proposal generator is proposed to obtain pseudo-labels from unlabeled data for initial feature learning. For the supervised fine-tuning, UPicker only needs a small amount of labeled data to achieve high accuracy in particle picking. To further enhance model performance, UPicker employs a contrastive denoising training strategy to reduce redundant detections and accelerate convergence, along with a hybrid data augmentation strategy to deal with limited labeled data. Comprehensive experiments on both simulated and experimental datasets demonstrate that UPicker outperforms state-of-the-art particle-picking methods in terms of accuracy and robustness while requiring fewer labeled data than other transformer-based models. Furthermore, ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of each component of UPicker. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/JachyLikeCoding/UPicker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.