Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39658045›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2025

Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering.

Ivan Vujaklija, Siniša Biđin, Marin Volarić, Sara Bakić, Zhe Li, Roger Foo, Jianjun Liu, Mile Šikić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epitranscriptomic alterations induced by environmental toxins: implications for RNA modifications and disease.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan VujaklijaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Siniša BiđinFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Marin VolarićLaboratory of non-coding DNA, Division of Molecular Biology, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Sara BakićGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Zhe LiGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Roger FooDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-4618
Jianjun LiuGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Mile ŠikićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-0891

Funding

AI Singapore AISG-RPKS-2019-001Genome Institute of Singapore
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, over 40 epigenetic and 300 epitranscriptomic modifications have been identified. However, current short-read sequencing-based experimental methods can detect <10% of these modifications. Integrating long-read sequencing technologies with advanced computational approaches, including statistical analysis and machine learning, offers a promising new frontier to address this challenge. While supervised machine learning methods have achieved some success, their usefulness is restricted to a limited number of well-characterized modifications. Here, we introduce Modena, an innovative unsupervised learning approach utilizing long-read nanopore sequencing capable of detecting a broad range of modifications. Modena outperformed other methods in five out of six benchmark datasets, in some cases by a wide margin, while being equally competitive with the second best method on one dataset. Uniquely, Modena also demonstrates consistent accuracy on a DNA dataset, distinguishing it from other approaches. A key feature of Modena is its use of 'dynamic thresholding', an approach based on 1D score-clustering. This methodology differs substantially from the traditional statistics-based 'hard-thresholds.' We show that this approach is not limited to Modena but has broader applicability. Specifically, when combined with two existing algorithms, 'dynamic thresholding' significantly enhances their performance, resulting in up to a threefold improvement in F1-scores.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsNanopore SequencingTranscriptomeAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansNanoporesSequence Analysis, DNAUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39658045
PMCPMC11724293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.