ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025
Comparison of Mechanical and Surface Properties between Conventional and CAD/CAM Provisional Restorations.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Effects of Isopropyl Alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, Pyridine, and Acetonitrile on Surface Roughness, Surface Morphology, and Shear Bond Strength Between Composite Resin and Different Provisional Restorative Materials.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated using milling, three-dimensional printing and conventional methods: An in vitro study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- Impact of curing temperature on accuracy and physical properties of additively manufactured FDPs and bar specimens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comparative In Vivo Analysis of Microhardness in Three Provisional Restorative Materials.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Surface roughness on retention of complete dentures using conventional and digital techniques: An in vitro study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Shear Bond Strength of Silane-Containing Universal Adhesives in Repairing Aged 3D-Printed Provisional Restorations With Flowable Composite: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Compressive and flexural strength of provisional crown materials fabricated by conventional and 3D printing techniques: An in vitro study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study compared the flexural strength, surface hardness, and surface roughness of conventional, milled, and three-dimensional (3D)-printed provisional restorations. MATERIALS AND
methodsBar-shaped polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The post hoc Tukey's honest significant difference was conducted to compare the differences value between groups (
resultsThe milled computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) provisional restorative material exhibited a significantly higher flexural strength (125.16 ± 6.83 MPa) compared with both the traditional (109.74 ± 14.14 MPa) and 3D-printed (71.09 ± 9.09 MPa) materials (
conclusionThe provisional restorations fabricated using milled PMMA technology provide adequate flexural strength, surface hardness, and low surface roughness, offering a viable alternative for creating provisional restorations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.