ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Active MMP-8 Point-of-Care Test in Peri-Implantitis.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy and smoking-driven modulation of salivary MMP-8, MMP-9, and HIF-1α in stage III grade B/C periodontitis: a cross-sectional study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Biomarker-Guided Implant Maintenance (BGIM): A Narrative Review and Protocol Proposal.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Research advances in early diagnosis and treatment strategies for peri-implantitis: from microecology to regenerative therapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Association of MMP-8 rs11225395 Polymorphism with the Susceptibility of Peri-Implantitis.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
- Association of MMP-8 -799C/T Polymorphism with Peri-Implantitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) quantitative chairside point-of-care (PoC) lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases, and it sought to correlate aMMP-8 levels with clinical parameters to determine its effectiveness as a biomarker for peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Participants included systemically healthy individuals with at least one implant loaded for more than 1 year, who had not received periodontal treatment or antibiotics in the preceding 6 months. Exclusion criteria included diabetes and immune-compromising conditions. Peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples were collected from the mesiobuccal or distobuccal site of the implant. The quantitative chairside PoC lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases (ImplantSafe test) and ORALyzer digital reader were used to analyze PISF, with results expressed in ng/mL. Clinical parameters such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), recession (REC), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at six sites per implant using a 15-mm scale periodontal probe.
resultsNo significant differences were found in age, gender distribution, or smoking status between the healthy/mucositis and peri-implantitis groups. The peri-implantitis group showed significantly higher mean percentages of BOP (57.58 ± 31.73 vs. 18.79 ± 24.17), PD (4.59 ± 1.22 mm vs. 2.94 ± 0.78 mm), and CAL (5.21 ± 1.72 mm vs. 3.05 ± 0.81 mm). aMMP-8 levels were also significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group (53.39 ± 49.70 vs. 22.03 ± 32.87). The diagnostic test demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.25% and specificity of 74.07%, with an area under the curve of 79.6%, indicating overall good accuracy in distinguishing between positive and negative conditions.
conclusionThe aMMP-8 is a promising biomarker for peri-implantitis, showing elevated levels in affected patients. The aMMP-8 chairside test demonstrates high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, supporting its use in early detection and monitoring of peri-implant diseases. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols for its clinical application and to explore its long-term predictive value in implant care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.