Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657936›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of Active MMP-8 Point-of-Care Test in Peri-Implantitis.

Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Leonidas Batas, Ioannis Vouros, Dimitra Sakellari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioannis FragkioudakisDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-0686
Leonidas BatasDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis VourosDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitra SakellariDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) quantitative chairside point-of-care (PoC) lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases, and it sought to correlate aMMP-8 levels with clinical parameters to determine its effectiveness as a biomarker for peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Participants included systemically healthy individuals with at least one implant loaded for more than 1 year, who had not received periodontal treatment or antibiotics in the preceding 6 months. Exclusion criteria included diabetes and immune-compromising conditions. Peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples were collected from the mesiobuccal or distobuccal site of the implant. The quantitative chairside PoC lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases (ImplantSafe test) and ORALyzer digital reader were used to analyze PISF, with results expressed in ng/mL. Clinical parameters such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), recession (REC), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at six sites per implant using a 15-mm scale periodontal probe.

resultsNo significant differences were found in age, gender distribution, or smoking status between the healthy/mucositis and peri-implantitis groups. The peri-implantitis group showed significantly higher mean percentages of BOP (57.58 ± 31.73 vs. 18.79 ± 24.17), PD (4.59 ± 1.22 mm vs. 2.94 ± 0.78 mm), and CAL (5.21 ± 1.72 mm vs. 3.05 ± 0.81 mm). aMMP-8 levels were also significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group (53.39 ± 49.70 vs. 22.03 ± 32.87). The diagnostic test demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.25% and specificity of 74.07%, with an area under the curve of 79.6%, indicating overall good accuracy in distinguishing between positive and negative conditions.

conclusionThe aMMP-8 is a promising biomarker for peri-implantitis, showing elevated levels in affected patients. The aMMP-8 chairside test demonstrates high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, supporting its use in early detection and monitoring of peri-implant diseases. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols for its clinical application and to explore its long-term predictive value in implant care.

Identifiers

PMID39657936
PMCPMC12182409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.