ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024
Towards AI-designed genomes using a variational autoencoder.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical review of artificial intelligence in synthetic biology: DBTL cycle applications, challenges, and design rules for microbial strain engineering.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Cell and Gene Therapy Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Deep Generative Model-Driven Design of Microbial Synthetic Promoters.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Towards AI-designed genomes using a variational autoencoder.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomes encode elaborate networks of genes whose products must seamlessly interact to support living organisms. Humans' capacity to understand these biological systems is limited by their sheer size and complexity. In this article, we develop a proof of concept framework for training a machine learning (ML) algorithm to model bacterial genome composition. To achieve this, we create simplified representations of genomes in the form of binary vectors that indicate the encoded genes, henceforth referred to as genome vectors. A denoising variational autoencoder was trained to accept corrupted genome vectors, in which most genes had been masked, and reconstruct the original. The resulting model, DeepGenomeVector, effectively captures complex dependencies in genomic networks, as evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative metrics. An in-depth functional analysis of a generated genome vector shows that its encoded pathways are interconnected, near complete, and ecologically cohesive. On the test set, where the model's ability to reconstruct uncorrupted genome vectors was evaluated, Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) and F1 scores of 0.98 and 0.83, respectively, support the model's strong performance. This article showcases the power of ML approaches for synthetic biology and highlights the possibility that artifical intelligence agents may one day be able to design genomes that animate carbon-based cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.