ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024
Modelling individual variation in human walking gait across populations and walking conditions via gait recognition.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Detection of Gait Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease Using Fewer Plantar Sensors in a Smart Insole.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Modelling individual variation in human walking gait across populations and walking conditions via gait recognition.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human walking gait is a personal story written by the body, a tool for understanding biological identity in healthcare and security. Gait analysis methods traditionally diverged between these domains but are now merging their complementary strengths to unlock new possibilities. Using large ground reaction force (GRF) datasets for gait recognition is a way to uncover subtle variations that define individual gait patterns. Previously, this was done by developing and evaluating machine learning models on the same individuals or the same dataset, potentially biasing findings towards population samples or walking conditions. This study introduces a new method for analysing gait variation across individuals, groups and datasets to explore how demographics and walking conditions shape individual gait patterns. Machine learning models were implemented using numerous configurations of four large walking GRF datasets from different countries (740 individuals, 7400 samples) and analysed using explainable artificial intelligence tools. Recognition accuracy ranged from 52 to 100%, with factors like footwear, walking speed and body mass playing interactive roles in defining gait. Models developed with individuals walking in personal footwear at multiple speeds effectively recognized novel individuals across populations and conditions (89-99% accuracy). Integrating force platform hardware and gait recognition software could be invaluable for reading the complex stories of human walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.