Returning value to communities from the All of Us Research Program through innovative approaches for data use, analysis, dissemination, and research capacity building.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. LGBQ+ Veteran and Service Member Health and Health Care: A Scoping Review of Research from 1994 to 2023.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Should we synthesize more than we need: impact of synthetic data generation for high-dimensional cross-sectional medical data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
   Article
3. Diversity, equity, and inclusion matter for biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum issued
  Correction to: Returning value to communities from the All of Us Research Program through innovative approaches for data use, analysis, dissemination, and research capacity building.2025

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.