SynthesisG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Fast analysis of biobank-size data and meta-analysis using the BGLR R-package.
Synthesis in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Response QTLs and DEGs Underlying Oil Palm Resistance toMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Improving polygenic score prediction for underrepresented groups through transfer learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Leveraging GWAS-Identified Markers in Combination with Bayesian and Machine Learning Models to Improve Genomic Selection in Soybean.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A Framework Integrating GWAS and Genomic Selection to Enhance Prediction Accuracy of Economical Traits in Common Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biobanks in GENETICS and G3: tackling the statistical challenges.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyzing human genomic data from biobanks and large-scale genetic evaluations often requires fitting models with a sample size exceeding the number of DNA markers used (n>p). For instance, developing polygenic scores for humans and genomic prediction for genetic evaluations of agricultural species may require fitting models involving a few thousand SNPs using data with hundreds of thousands of samples. In such cases, computations based on sufficient statistics are more efficient than those based on individual genotype-phenotype data. Additionally, software that admits sufficient statistics as inputs can be used to analyze data from multiple sources jointly without the need to share individual genotype-phenotype data. Therefore, we developed functionality within the BGLR R-package that generates posterior samples for Bayesian shrinkage and variable selection models from sufficient statistics. In this article, we present an overview of the new methods incorporated in the BGLR R-package, demonstrate the use of the new software through simple examples, provide several computational benchmarks, and present a real-data example using data from the UK-Biobank, All of Us, and the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos cohort demonstrating how a joint analysis from multiple cohorts can be implemented without sharing individual genotype-phenotype data, and how a combined analysis can improve the prediction accuracy of polygenic scores for Hispanics-a group severely under-represented in genome-wide association studies data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.