Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657731›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Commercial influences on patient and public involvement: a renewed call for research and action.

Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey, James Larkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marita HennessyCollege of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-8118
Tom FaheyDepartment of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
James LarkinDepartment of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board SPHeRE/2013/1Irish Research Council Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship Award GOIPD/2023/1168Postdoctoral Researcher ILP-HSR-2019-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and public involvement is increasingly advocated in health policy, research and practice. Patients and people with lived experience, carers and the general public should have a say in how policy is generated, how services are delivered and how research is conducted. Through this perspective article, we hope to stimulate discussion and debate around industry influence in patient and public involvement, specifically pertaining to patient organizations, which often play a key role in patient and public involvement activities. As momentum gathers around patient and public involvement in many countries, it is timely to discuss the nature and extent of commercial influences in such activities, the (un)anticipated consequences of industry-patient interactions, including conflicts of interest and motivated bias, and how we might better manage, or negate, such interactions. Patient and public involvement must be integral to research, policy and practice. While further research is needed to examine the interactions, and consequences of pharmaceutical industry interactions with patients, several practical steps can be taken in the interim. Structures, processes and supports, which are fit for purpose, are needed to ensure independence, power and legitimacy within patient and public involvement activities, and that patient advocates have their voices heard, and ultimately acted upon.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationConflict of InterestPatient ParticipationDrug IndustryHealth PolicyHumansconflict of interestethicspatient advocacypatient and public involvementpharmaceutical industrypublic healthresearch

Identifiers

PMID39657731
PMCPMC11631069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.