Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657689›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

SpudDB: a database for accessing potato genomic data.

John P Hamilton, Julia Brose, C Robin Buell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tracing modern breeding introgressions in European potato.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John P HamiltonDepartment of Crop & Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Julia BroseCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
C Robin BuellDepartment of Crop & Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-4677

Funding

Department of Agriculture 2019-51181-30021Georgia Research AllianceNational Science Foundation IOS-2140176the University of Georgia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potato is a key food crop with a complex, polyploid genome. Advancements in sequencing technologies coupled with improvements in genome assembly algorithms have enabled generation of phased, chromosome-scale genome assemblies for cultivated tetraploid potato. The SpudDB database houses potato genome sequence and annotation, with the doubled monoploid DM 1-3 516 R44 (hereafter DM) genome serving as the reference genome and haplotype. Diverse annotation data types for DM genes are provided through a suite of Gene Report Pages including gene expression profiles across 438 potato samples. To further annotate potato genes based on expression, 65 gene co-expression modules were constructed that permit the identification of tightly co-regulated genes within DM across development and responses to wounding, abiotic stress, and biotic stress. Genome browser views of DM and 28 other potato genomes are provided along with a download page for genome sequence and annotation. To link syntenic genes within and between haplotypes, syntelogs were identified across 25 cultivated potato genomes. Through access to potato genome sequences and associated annotations, SpudDB can enable potato biologists, geneticists, and breeders to continue to improve this key food crop.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, PlantSolanum tuberosumGenomicsHaplotypesMolecular Sequence Annotationannotationco-expressiondiversitypotato

Identifiers

PMID39657689
PMCPMC11912843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.