ArticleCell reports methods2024
Ensemble and consensus approaches to prediction of recessive inheritance for missense variants in human disease.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the utility of variant effect predictions with phenotype-specific models.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mode of inheritance (MOI) is necessary for clinical interpretation of pathogenic variants; however, the majority of variants lack this information. Furthermore, variant effect predictors are fundamentally insensitive to recessive-acting diseases. Here, we present MOI-Pred, a variant pathogenicity prediction tool that accounts for MOI, and ConMOI, a consensus method that integrates variant MOI predictions from three independent tools. MOI-Pred integrates evolutionary and functional annotations to produce variant-level predictions that are sensitive to both dominant-acting and recessive-acting pathogenic variants. Both MOI-Pred and ConMOI show state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks. Importantly, dominant and recessive predictions from both tools are enriched in individuals with pathogenic variants for dominant- and recessive-acting diseases, respectively, in a real-world electronic health record (EHR)-based validation approach of 29,981 individuals. ConMOI outperforms its component methods in benchmarking and validation, demonstrating the value of consensus among multiple prediction methods. Predictions for all possible missense variants are provided in the "Data and code availability" section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.