ArticleEBioMedicine2025
Post-treatment duration of positivity for standard and ultra-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests, a cohort study from a low-endemic setting in Namibia.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of novel Biocredit species-specific LDH-based immunochromatographic assay for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Peptide-Enabled Nanoplatforms for Malaria and Leishmaniasis: From Intracellular Targeting to Translational Diagnostic Perspectives.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Challenges in Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment in Kinshasa Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Point of care performance of the improved BIOCREDIT Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) rapid diagnostic test: a cross-sectional study at a health center setting in Ethiopia.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Current practices and innovative diagnostics for Malaria in Ethiopia: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Evaluating the performance of an artificial intelligence-based electronic reader for malaria rapid diagnostic tests across Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Uganda.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Estimating malaria antigen dynamics and the time to negativity of next-generation malaria rapid diagnostic tests.Malaria journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and newer ultra-sensitive RDT (uRDT) target Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein-2 (HRP2), which persists post-treatment. The duration of test positivity has not previously been studied in a low transmission setting.
methodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study in a low transmission setting in Namibia. RDT-positive individuals identified through passive and active case detection were treated and followed weekly for testing by RDT and uRDT, HRP2 quantification, quantitative PCR (qPCR) of parasitemia, and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) of gametocytemia, until RDT and uRDT were negative for two consecutive weeks. Determinants of persistent positivity were identified using Cox proportional hazards models.
findingsAmong 137 participants with complete follow-up and no evidence of resurgence during follow-up, median duration of positivity was 42 days (range: 3-98 range) for RDT, compared to 67 days (range 12-105) for uRDT. In a sub-analysis of those with laboratory data before treatment (n = 60), drug resistance did not explain persistent positivity. Younger age (<15 years versus ≥15 years: aHR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.04-3.30, and 1.67, 95% CI 0.96-2.89, for RDT and uRDT, respectively), higher initial parasite density (highest versus lowest tertile: aHR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.32 and 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.48 for RDT and uRDT, respectively), and persistent parasitemia (≥7 days versus reference of <7 days, aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76, and 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.76 for RDT and uRDT, respectively) were associated with longer duration of positivity.
interpretationDuration of RDT/uRDT positivity was more than double compared to reports from higher endemic settings, potentially due to lower population immunity to clear parasite DNA and antigen. Prolonged duration of positivity compromises their use to detect current infection, but increased detection of recent infection can facilitate surveillance and inform elimination efforts.
fundingThe project was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (A128488 and INV1135840), Horchow Family Fund (5300375400), and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.