Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657215›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Qualitative Research Leaders: Evaluation of Pilot Global Pipeline Program.

Monique M Hennink, Donna J Ingles, Blandina T Mmbaga, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Douglas C Heimburger, Leslie C M Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monique M HenninkHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Donna J InglesCenter for Technology Transfer and Commercialization, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre and Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India and Centre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Douglas C HeimburgerVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Leslie C M JohnsonDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Vanderbilt-Emory-Cornell-Duke Global Health Fellowship Consortium-Expanding Diversity for Global Equity (EDGE)D43TW009337 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALIYU, MUKTAR HASSAN, HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT · 2017 to 2021
$6.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research methods are central to understanding many public health problems. However, capacity building for qualitative research is globally skewed toward high-income countries, with a significant skills deficit in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this imbalance and provide a model program, we developed the Qualitative Research Leaders (QRL) program, a pipeline program to increase qualitative research capacity in LMIC institutions and foster leadership in qualitative research. The QRL program is a collaboration between Emory University and Vanderbilt University in the United States and two LMIC institutions Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College in Tanzania and the Public Health Foundation of India. The program had five phases conducted over 12 months: 1) mentored study design sessions, 2) an in-country skill-building workshop, 3) mentored proposal development sessions, 4) a residential grant writing program in the United States, and 5) mentor matching for field implementation. Program evaluation results showed that the QRL program was effectively designed, and scholars valued the program components, learning formats, and session content. The program increased scholars' knowledge, skills, and confidence as mentors in qualitative research. Furthermore, scholars demonstrated leadership in initiating postprogram research, mentoring, and teaching in qualitative research. Overall, scholars felt that the program could be extended to enable more time to internalize new knowledge and develop skills, and the role of in-country mentors could be expanded to further support scholars during fieldwork. In this article, we describe the components of the QRL program and its implementation, results of our program evaluation, and lessons learned for developing similar pipeline training programs.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingLeadershipQualitative ResearchDeveloping CountriesHumansIndiaMentorsPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationTanzaniaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39657215
PMCPMC11884274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.