Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657162›Full record

ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2025

Anti-integrin αvβ6 Antibodies Predict Pouchitis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis After Restorative Proctocolectomy With Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Risa Nakanishi, Takeshi Kuwada, Masahiro Shiokawa, Yoshihiro Nishikawa, Sakiko Ota, Hajime Yamazaki, Takafumi Yanaidani, Kenji Sawada, Ayako Hirata, Muneji Yasuda and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Primary Prevention of Pouchitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Risa NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-4316-3861
Takeshi KuwadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9808-4139
Masahiro ShiokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-3888
Yoshihiro NishikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1113-6937
Sakiko OtaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hajime YamazakiSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-4370
Takafumi YanaidaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenji SawadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ayako HirataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Muneji YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ikuhisa TakimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koki ChikugoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masataka YokodeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuya MuramotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shimpei MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoaki MatsumoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1220-6546
Norimitsu UzaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsutomu ChibaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroshi SenoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists 22K16017Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPouchitis is the most common complication of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We previously reported the presence of anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies in the serum of patients with UC. This study investigated the association between anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies and the development of pouchitis in patients with UC.

methodsSerum levels of anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 16 patients with UC who underwent RPC with IPAA. Integrin αvβ6 expression in the colonic, terminal ileal, and pouch epithelium was examined using immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis.

resultsAnti-integrin αvβ6 antibody levels in patients with UC were significantly decreased at 3, 9, and 12 months after RPC (P < .05). However, in patients who developed pouchitis, antibody levels remained high. The antibody levels at the time of RPC were significantly higher in patients who developed pouchitis compared to those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of pouchitis in patients with antibody levels above the cutoff at the time of RPC. Although integrin αvβ6 was not expressed in the terminal ileal epithelium at the time of RPC, expression became positive in the pouch epithelium of patients with pouchitis.

conclusionsThe anti-integrin αvβ6 antibody levels in patients with UC were decreased after RPC but remained high in patients who developed pouchitis. The antibody levels at the time of RPC may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for predicting the risk of pouchitis in patients with UC.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmColitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesIntegrinsPostoperative ComplicationsPouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativeAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalBiomarkersBlotting, WesternEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersintegrin alphavbeta6Integrinsautoantibodyintegrin αvβ6pouchitisrestorative proctocolectomyulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39657162
PMCPMC11890122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.