Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39657103›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

Stratum corneum nanotexture feature detection using deep learning and spatial analysis: a noninvasive tool for skin barrier assessment.

Jen-Hung Wang, Jorge Pereda, Ching-Wen Du, Chia-Yu Chu, Maria Oberländer Christensen, Sanja Kezic, Ivone Jakasa, Jacob P Thyssen, Sreeja Satheesh, Edwin En-Te Hwu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jen-Hung WangDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9214-5837
Jorge PeredaDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-0591
Ching-Wen DuDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0006-5517-1845
Chia-Yu ChuDepartment of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100225, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9370-3279
Maria Oberländer ChristensenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital (BFH), University Hospitals of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2400, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-1054
Sanja KezicDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-4547
Ivone JakasaLaboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-4069
Jacob P ThyssenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital (BFH), University Hospitals of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2400, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-1743
Sreeja SatheeshInstitute of Solid State Physics, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover 30167, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-4239-2578
Edwin En-Te HwuDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-4978

Funding

Intelligent Drug Delivery and Sensing using Microcontainers and Nanomechanics (IDUN)LEO Foundation LF-OC-20-000370National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan NSTC 112-2314-B-002-074-MY3Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF22OC0076607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorneocyte surface nanoscale topography (nanotexture) has recently emerged as a potential biomarker for inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD). This assessment method involves quantifying circular nano-size objects (CNOs) in corneocyte nanotexture images, enabling noninvasive analysis via stratum corneum (SC) tape stripping. Current approaches for identifying CNOs rely on computer vision techniques with specific geometric criteria, resulting in inaccuracies due to the susceptibility of nano-imaging techniques to environmental noise and structural occlusion on the corneocyte.

resultsThis study recruited 45 AD patients and 15 healthy controls, evenly divided into 4 severity groups based on their Eczema Area and Severity Index scores. Subsequently, we collected a dataset of over 1,000 corneocyte nanotexture images using our in-house high-speed dermal atomic force microscope. This dataset was utilized to train state-of-the-art deep learning object detectors for identifying CNOs. Additionally, we implemented a kernel density estimator to analyze the spatial distribution of CNOs, excluding ineffective regions with minimal CNO occurrence, such as ridges and occlusions, thereby enhancing accuracy in density calculations. After fine-tuning, our detection model achieved an overall accuracy of 91.4% in detecting CNOs.

conclusionsBy integrating deep learning object detector with spatial analysis algorithms, we developed a precise methodology for calculating CNO density, termed the Effective Corneocyte Topographical Index (ECTI). The ECTI demonstrated exceptional robustness to nano-imaging artifacts and presents substantial potential for advancing AD diagnostics by effectively distinguishing between SC samples of varying AD severity and healthy controls.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDermatitis, AtopicEpidermisAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMiddle AgedSpatial Analysisatomic force microscope (AFM)atopic dermatitis (AD)corneocyte surface topographydeep learningkernel density estimator (KDE)object detection

Identifiers

PMID39657103
PMCPMC11629979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.