ReviewMagyar onkologia2024
[Molecular pathology of gastrointestinal neoplasms].
Review in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular pathological examination of solid tumors is essential not only for supporting histological diagnosis but also for detecting hereditary variations and predictive biomarkers. Analyzing predictive markers is fundamental to personalized cancer therapy, directly affecting patient care through pathological testing. These analyses employ both traditional immunohistochemical staining methods and molecular genetic techniques. In both approaches, preanalytics is of critical importance, necessitating the adoption of standardized and reproducible processes. Molecular diagnostics in colorectal cancer focuses on detecting activating mutations in the MAPK pathway (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF), as well as evaluating microsatellite instability and HER2 amplification. Immunohistochemical methods can effectively identify biomarkers for gastric cancers, including the novel claudin18.2. The responsiveness of gastrointestinal stromal tumors to imatinib requires validation via molecular testing. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer may see enhanced survival rates by targeted therapy addressing microsatellite instability and BRCA mutations. In bile duct malignancies, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the small duct variant, the analysis of IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions presents new treatment prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39657043PMC11841737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.