ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Knowledge mining of brain connectivity in massive literature based on transfer learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNeuroscientists have long endeavored to map brain connectivity, yet the intricate nature of brain networks often leads them to concentrate on specific regions, hindering efforts to unveil a comprehensive connectivity map. Recent advancements in imaging and text mining techniques have enabled the accumulation of a vast body of literature containing valuable insights into brain connectivity, facilitating the extraction of whole-brain connectivity relations from this corpus. However, the diverse representations of brain region names and connectivity relations pose a challenge for conventional machine learning methods and dictionary-based approaches in identifying all instances accurately.
resultsWe propose BioSEPBERT, a biomedical pre-trained model based on start-end position pointers and BERT. In addition, our model integrates specialized identifiers with enhanced self-attention capabilities for preceding and succeeding brain regions, thereby improving the performance of named entity recognition and relation extraction in neuroscience. Our approach achieves optimal F1 scores of 85.0%, 86.6%, and 86.5% for named entity recognition, connectivity relation extraction, and directional relation extraction, respectively, surpassing state-of-the-art models by 2.6%, 1.1%, and 1.1%. Furthermore, we leverage BioSEPBERT to extract 22.6 million standardized brain regions and 165 072 directional relations from a corpus comprising 1.3 million abstracts and 193 100 full-text articles. The results demonstrate that our model facilitates researchers to rapidly acquire knowledge regarding neural circuits across various brain regions, thereby enhancing comprehension of brain connectivity in specific regions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and source code are available at: http://atlas.brainsmatics.org/res/BioSEPBERT and https://github.com/Brainsmatics/BioSEPBERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.