Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656948›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2025

Strategies for Effective Public Health Communication in a Complex Information Environment.

Jeff Niederdeppe, Amanda D Boyd, Andy J King, Rajiv N Rimal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. So what? Elevating the impact of implementation science.Implementation science communications · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeff NiederdeppeCornell Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Amanda D BoydEdward R. Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Andy J KingDepartment of Communication and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Rajiv N RimalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066509 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jeffrey J Iliff · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Using Natural Language Processing and Crowdsourcing to Monitor and Evaluate Public Information and Communication Disparities about Colon Cancer ScreeningR37CA259156 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Andy J King · 2021 to 2026
$2.3M
Advancing Alzheimer's Disease Communication and Recruitment Science among American Indians and Alaska NativesK01AG066063 · NIA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, AMANDA D. · 2021 to 2025
$580k
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA259156NIA NIH HHS K01 AG066063NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development and amplification of effective, culturally resonant, trustworthy, and evidence-based public health communication are urgently needed. Research evidence, theory, and practical experience from within and beyond the interdisciplinary field of health communication are well-positioned to help public health authorities, researchers, and advocates navigate the complex societal challenges that influence health and well-being in global contexts. This review offers a broad overview of the field, considers what constitutes "effectiveness" versus "effects" in public health communication, and describes core concepts of public health communication as a process rather than a product. We review domains and dominant foci of public health communication research, articulate challenges for health communication to advance health and social equity and address mis-/disinformation, and offer practical guidance on message development, audience segmentation, multilevel intervention, and evaluation of communication programs. We conclude by identifying important questions for future public health communication research, interventions, and funding.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth CommunicationPublic HealthHumansbehavioral scienceeffectivenesshealth communicationhealth equitymisinformationmultilevel interventions

Identifiers

PMID39656948
PMCPMC12684255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.