Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656947›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of medicine2025

Emily F Eix, Jeniel E Nett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multicenter performance evaluation of the SimplexaJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Morphotype-specific susceptibility toMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Outcomes of Micafungin and Anidulafungin inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. RefractoryASM case reports · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily F EixDepartment of Medicine and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; email: jenett@medicine.wisc.edu.
Jeniel E NettDepartment of Medicine and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; email: jenett@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

Mechanism(s) of pathogenicity for Candida aurisR01AI145939 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NETT, JENIEL E · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
Characterizing Candida auris skin colonization and high-burden biofilm formationR21AI159583 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NETT, JENIEL E · 2021 to 2022
$427k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145939NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI159583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida aurisCandidiasisCross InfectionDrug Resistance, FungalHumansRisk FactorsAntifungal AgentsantifungalCandida aurisdrug resistanceepidemiologymicrobiomeskin colonizationtransmissiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID39656947
PMCPMC11808652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.