ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
Objectively Measured Physical Activity Using Wrist-Worn Accelerometers as a Predictor of Incident Alzheimer's Disease in the UK Biobank.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Sleep-Wake Cycle Metrics and Dementia Prediction in Older Adults.JAMA neurology · 2026Article
- Associations of accelerometry-derived time in major activity intensities with cognitive outcomes: a compositional data analysis approach.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- UK Biobank at 20 - a growing, global resource for dementia research.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Exploring Links between Brain Image-Derived Phenotypes and Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity in the UK Biobank.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Quantifying Human Locomotor Activity on Examining Sleep-Wake Cycles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physical Activity Over the Adult Life Course and Risk of Dementia in the Framingham Heart Study.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) affects over 6 million people and is the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. This study compares wrist-worn accelerometry-derived PA measures against traditional risk factors for incident AD in the UK Biobank.
methodsOf 42 157 UK Biobank participants 65 years and older who had accelerometry data and no prior AD diagnosis, 157 developed AD by April 1, 2021 (264 988 person-years or on average 6.2 years of follow-up). Twelve traditional predictors and 8 accelerometer-based physical activity (PA) measures were used in single- and multivariate Cox models. Their predictive performances for future AD diagnosis were compared across models using the repeated cross-validated concordance (rcvC). To account for potential reverse causality, sensitivity analyses were conducted by removing dropouts and cases within the first 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
resultsThe best-performing individual predictors of incident AD were age (p < .0001, rcvC = 0.658) and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA, p = .0001, rcvC = 0.622). Forward selection produced a model that included age, diabetes, and MVPA (rcvC = 0.681). Adding MVPA to the model containing age and diabetes improved its rcvC from 0.665 to 0.681 (p = .0030), more than all other potential risk factors considered.
conclusionsObjective PA summaries are the best single predictors among modifiable risk factors with a predictive performance close to that of age. Adding PA summaries to traditional risk factors for AD substantially increases the predictive performance of these models. Increasing MVPA by 14.5 minutes per day reduces the hazard substantially, equivalent to 2 years younger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.