ArticleBiometrics2024
An adaptive enrichment design using Bayesian model averaging for selection and threshold-identification of predictive variables.
Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Repurposed Systemic Pharmacologic Agents in Chronic Pain: Emerging Mechanistic and Clinical Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision medicine is transforming healthcare by offering tailored treatments that enhance patient outcomes and reduce costs. As our understanding of complex diseases improves, clinical trials increasingly aim to detect subgroups of patients with enhanced treatment effects. Biomarker-driven adaptive enrichment designs, which initially enroll a broad population and later restrict to treatment-sensitive patients, are gaining popularity. However, current practice often assumes either pre-trial knowledge of biomarkers or a simple, linear relationship between continuous markers and treatment effectiveness. Motivated by a trial studying rheumatoid arthritis treatment, we propose a Bayesian adaptive enrichment design to identify predictive variables from a larger set of candidate biomarkers. Our approach uses a flexible modeling framework where the effects of continuous biomarkers are represented using free knot B-splines. We then estimate key parameters by marginalizing over all possible variable combinations using Bayesian model averaging. At interim analyses, we assess whether a biomarker-defined subgroup has enhanced or reduced treatment effects, allowing for early termination for efficacy or futility and restricting future enrollment to treatment-sensitive patients. We consider both pre-categorized and continuous biomarkers, the latter potentially having complex, nonlinear relationships to the outcome and treatment effect. Through simulations, we derive the operating characteristics of our design and compare its performance to existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.