ArticlePloS one2024
Creating simple predictive models in ecology, conservation and environmental policy based on Bayesian belief networks.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating post 2024 election scenarios for the UK based on political party manifestos.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive models are often complex to produce and interpret, yet can offer valuable insights for management, conservation and policy-making. Here we introduce a new modelling tool (the R package 'BBNet'), which is simple to use, and requires little mathematical or computer programming background. By using straightforward concepts to describe interactions between model components, predictive models can be effectively constructed using basic spreadsheet tools and loaded into the R package. These models can be analysed, visualised, and sensitivity tested to assess how information flows through the system's components and provide predictions for future outcomes of the systems. This paper provides a theoretical background to the models, which are modified Bayesian belief networks (BBNs), and an overview of how the package can be used. The models are not fully quantitative, but outcomes between different modelled scenarios can be considered ordinally (i.e. ranked from 'best' to 'worse'). Parameterisation of models can also be through data, literature, expert opinion, questionnaires and/or surveys of opinion, which are expressed as a simple 'weak' to 'very strong' or 1-4 integer value for interactions between model components. While we have focussed on the use of the models in environmental and ecological problems (including with links to management and social outcomes), their application does not need to be restricted to these disciplines, and use in financial systems, molecular biology, political sciences and many other disciplines are possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.