ArticlePloS one2024
Evaluation of VP4-VP2 sequencing for molecular typing of human enteroviruses.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Recovery of an 18bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A CRISPR/Cas12a-based reverse transcription multiple cross displacement amplification technique for sensitive, rapid, and highly specific detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enteroviruses and rhinoviruses are highly diverse, with over 300 identified types. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays targeting their VP1, VP4, and partial VP2 (VP4-pVP2) genomic regions are used for detection and identification. The VP4-pVP2 region is particularly sensitive to RT-PCR detection, making it efficient for clinical specimen analysis. However, a standard type identification method using this region is lacking. This study aimed to establish such a method by examining the divergence of VP4-pVP2 amino acid sequences between enterovirus and rhinovirus prototypes. Pairwise analysis of 249 types indicated a 95% threshold for enterovirus intra-species identification but not for rhinovirus prototypes. Protein BLAST search analyses of representative enterovirus prototypes, including EV-A71, EV-D68, CVA6, CVA10, CVA16, and polioviruses (PVs), validated the 95% threshold for typing, with a few exceptions such as PV1-PV2 and CVA6-CVA10, as well as some EV-C types. This study proposes a criterion for typing based on VP4-pVP2 amino acids, which can aid in rapid enterovirus diagnosis during routine clinical or environmental surveillance and emergency outbreaks. Our research confirms the reliability of the suggested VP4-pVP2-based threshold for typing and its potential application in laboratory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.