ArticleThe oncologist2025
Squamous cell carcinoma arising in chronically damaged skin (Marjolin's Ulcer): still an unmet need in the era of immunotherapy.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Marjolin's Ulcer in Patients With Anogenital Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryPooled it
- Immunotherapy for early-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Metastatic Marjolin Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Single-center Experience.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Topographic analysis of head skin cancers: eight-year observations.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Article
- Review
- In reply to: "Letter to the editor in response to the article:'Squamous cell carcinoma arising in chronically damaged skin (Marjolijn's Ulcer)'".The oncologist · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor in response to the article: "Squamous cell carcinoma arising in chronically damaged skin (Marjolijn's Ulcer)".The oncologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is characterized by a high tumor mutational burden due to solar damage and a favorable response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Yet, we encounter tumors arising in areas with minimal sun exposure, such as cSCC that develops in chronically inflamed skin, also known as Marjolin's Ulcer (MU). The response of MU-SCC to immunotherapy remains unknown.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with cSCC and treated with cemiplimab or pembrolizumab in a single tertiary medical center. Patients lost to follow up were excluded.
resultsOf the 84 eligible patients, 9 (11%) had MU-SCC. Of these, 2 (22%) reached partial response (PR), and none reached complete response (CR). In contrast, of the 75 patients with solar damage-related cSCC, 40 had PR (53%), and 20 had CR (26%). The difference between the two subtypes was significant (P < .001). Interestingly, 3 patients with MU-SCC received a second-line chemo-immunotherapy and experienced a partial response that continued for 5 to 21 months. Patients with MU-SCC had a significantly shorter median time to progression (TTP) (1.6 vs 51.6 months, P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.6 vs 15.4 months, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly shorter (17.4 vs 36.7 months, P = .096). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MU-SCC is an independent risk factor for shorter TTP (HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.2-14.0, P < .001) and PFS (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.1, P = .003).
conclusionsThis study suggests that immunotherapy is less beneficial in SCC-MU. More work is needed to verify our findings and explore other treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.