Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656718›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Squamous cell carcinoma arising in chronically damaged skin (Marjolin's Ulcer): still an unmet need in the era of immunotherapy.

Mor Miodovnik, Yardenna Dolev, Roni Buchen, Miriam Rivka Brezis, Alla Nikolaevski-Berlin, Inbar Finkel, Ido Wolf, Inna Ospovat, Orit Gutfeld, Yasmin Leshem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immunotherapy for early-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Metastatic Marjolin Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Single-center Experience.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mor MiodovnikOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8027-4631
Yardenna DolevOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Roni BuchenSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Miriam Rivka BrezisOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Alla Nikolaevski-BerlinOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Inbar FinkelOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ido WolfOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Inna OspovatOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Orit GutfeldOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yasmin LeshemOncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8264-1308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is characterized by a high tumor mutational burden due to solar damage and a favorable response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Yet, we encounter tumors arising in areas with minimal sun exposure, such as cSCC that develops in chronically inflamed skin, also known as Marjolin's Ulcer (MU). The response of MU-SCC to immunotherapy remains unknown.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with cSCC and treated with cemiplimab or pembrolizumab in a single tertiary medical center. Patients lost to follow up were excluded.

resultsOf the 84 eligible patients, 9 (11%) had MU-SCC. Of these, 2 (22%) reached partial response (PR), and none reached complete response (CR). In contrast, of the 75 patients with solar damage-related cSCC, 40 had PR (53%), and 20 had CR (26%). The difference between the two subtypes was significant (P < .001). Interestingly, 3 patients with MU-SCC received a second-line chemo-immunotherapy and experienced a partial response that continued for 5 to 21 months. Patients with MU-SCC had a significantly shorter median time to progression (TTP) (1.6 vs 51.6 months, P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.6 vs 15.4 months, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly shorter (17.4 vs 36.7 months, P = .096). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MU-SCC is an independent risk factor for shorter TTP (HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.2-14.0, P < .001) and PFS (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.1, P = .003).

conclusionsThis study suggests that immunotherapy is less beneficial in SCC-MU. More work is needed to verify our findings and explore other treatment options.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellImmunotherapySkin NeoplasmsSkin UlcerAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedcemiplimabpembrolizumabcutaneous squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapymarjolin’s ulcerPD-1

Identifiers

PMID39656718
PMCPMC12395235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.