Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Introducing a blocked procedure in nonparametric CD-CAT.

Jiahui Zhang, Yuqing Yuan, Ziying Qiu, Feng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahui ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yuqing YuanSchool of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ziying QiuSchool of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Feng LiCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6550-1459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT), in conjunction with nonparametric methodologies, is an adaptive assessment tool utilized for diagnosing students' knowledge mastery within smaller educational contexts. Expanding upon this framework, this study introduces the blocked procedure previously used in the parametric CD-CAT, enhancing the flexibility of nonparametric CD-CAT by enabling within-block item review and answer modification. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate the performance of this blocked procedure within the context of nonparametric CD-CAT across varied conditions. With increasing block size, there was a marginal reduction in pattern correct classification rate; however, such differences diminished as item quality or test length augmented. Overall, under a majority of conditions, the blocked procedure, characterized by block sizes of 2 or 4 items, allows item review within-block while attaining satisfactory levels of classification accuracy. The integration of within-block item review and answer modification with nonparametric CD-CAT fosters a more adaptive and learner-centric testing environment.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementCognitionComputer SimulationHumansStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID39656707
PMCPMC11630612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.