Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Using diagnostic data from veterinary diagnostic laboratories to unravel macroepidemiological aspects of porcine circoviruses 2 and 3 in the United States from 2002-2023.

Guilherme Cezar, Edison Magalhães, Kinath Rupasinghe, Srijita Chandra, Gustavo Silva, Marcelo Almeida, Bret Crim, Eric Burrough, Phillip Gauger, Christopher Siepker and 28 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Guilherme CezarVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3554-457X
Edison MagalhãesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Kinath RupasingheVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Srijita ChandraVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Gustavo SilvaVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Marcelo AlmeidaVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-7721
Bret CrimVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Eric BurroughVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Phillip GaugerVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Christopher SiepkerVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Marta MainentiVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Michael ZellerVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-6931
Eduardo FanoVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Pablo PiñeyroVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Rodger MainVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Mary ThurnVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Paulo LagesVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Cesar CorzoVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Albert RoviraVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Hemant NaikareVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rob McGaugheyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Franco Matias-FerreyraCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jamie RetallickCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jordan GebhardtCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jon GresethVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
Darren KerseyVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
Travis ClementVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
Angela PillatzkiVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
Jane Christopher-HenningsVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
Melanie PraratOhio Animal Disease and Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States of America.
Ashley JohnsonOhio Animal Disease and Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States of America.
Dennis SummersOhio Animal Disease and Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States of America.
Craig BowenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Joseph BoyleCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Kenitra HendrixCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Andreia G ArrudaDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Daniel LinharesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Giovani TrevisanVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4980-526X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine circoviruses (PCVs), including porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), have been associated with clinical syndromes in swine, resulting in significant economic losses. To better understand the epidemiology and clinical relevance of PCV2 and PCV3, this study analyzed a dataset comprising diagnostic data from six veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) in the United States of America. The data comprised of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results, sample type, and age group for PCV2 and PCV3 submissions from 2002-2023. Findings indicated a decrease in the percentage of PCV2-positive submissions after introducing a commercial PCV2 vaccine in 2006 and a resurgence in positivity after 2018, particularly in breeding herds, associated with an increased number of submissions using processing fluid samples. After its first report in the U.S. in 2016, PCV3 detection had an upward trend in the percentage of positive cases, peaking in spring 2023. PCV3 detection was more frequent in adult/sow farms, while PCV2 was more frequently detected in the wean-to-market category. An additional analysis used results from tissue diagnostic data from 2019-2023 from one VDL to associate PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values with the probability of confirming a PCV2 or PCV3 disease diagnosis confirmation. An interpretative PCR Ct cutoff for PCV2 and PCV3 diagnoses was assessed based on the logistic regression model associating Ct values with the presence of tissue lesions. The analysis considered only cases tested for PCV2 and PCV3 by PCR with tissue evaluations by diagnosticians. An interpretative Ct cutoff of 22.4 for PCV2 was associated with a high probability of confirming a diagnosis of PCV2 clinical disease through histopathology. For PCV3, the interpretative cutoff with the highest performance was 26.7. These findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to monitor and understand the clinical relevance of PCV2 and PCV3 PCR results, identifying potential disease challenges.

Indexed as

Circoviridae InfectionsCircovirusSwine DiseasesAnimalsFemaleLaboratoriesPolymerase Chain ReactionSwineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39656698
PMCPMC11630593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.