Observational studyJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Real-world data of first-line treatment with pembrolizumab for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in elderly patients: a subgroup analysis of HOT/NJLCG2001.
Observational study in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%), this study aimed to determine whether pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (COMB) should be selected.
methodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter study (sub-analysis of the HOT/NJLCG2001 trial) of 299 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as the first-line treatment between December 2018 and January 2020. We selected patients aged 75 years and older and assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity.
resultsIn total, 81 (median age: 79 years) and 19 (median age: 76 years) patients received MONO and COMB, respectively. Twenty patients with a performance status (PS) score of 2-3 were enrolled in the MONO group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.8 and 8.9 months in the MONO and COMB groups, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 and 20.3 months, and the 2-year survival rates were 38.8 and 49.9%, respectively. Furthermore, 29.6% and 26.3% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, respectively. In MONO, patients with PS 0-1 had a longer PFS (10.5 months) and OS (21.7 months) than those with PS 2-3 (0.7 and 1.6 months, respectively).
conclusionSome elderly patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression might benefit from COMB; however, MONO is considered the preferred treatment. MONO may not be an effective or feasible treatment for patients with PS 2-3, even with high PD-L1 expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.