Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656657›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2024

Days at home after surgery as a perioperative outcome: scoping review and recommendations for use in health services research.

Tiago Ribeiro, Armaan K Malhotra, Adom Bondzi-Simpson, Antoine Eskander, Negar Ahmadi, Frances C Wright, Daniel I McIsaac, Alyson Mahar, Angela Jerath, Natalie Coburn and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tiago RibeiroDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9167-8700
Armaan K MalhotraDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adom Bondzi-SimpsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-3290-1009
Antoine EskanderInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Negar AhmadiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Frances C WrightDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel I McIsaacDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-1859
Alyson MaharSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Angela JerathInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie CoburnDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julie HalletDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-1072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDays at home after surgery is a promising new patient-centred outcome metric that measures time spent outside of healthcare institutions and mortality. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the use of days at home in perioperative research and evaluate how it has been termed, defined, and validated, with a view to inform future use.

methodsThe search was run on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 30 March 2023 to capture all perioperative research where days at home or equivalent was measured. Days at home was defined as any outcome where time spent outside of hospitals and/or healthcare institutions was calculated.

resultsA total of 78 articles were included. Days at home has been increasingly used, with most studies published in 2022 (35, 45%). Days at home has been applied in multiple study design types, with varying terminology applied. There is variability in how days at home has been defined, with variation in measures of healthcare utilization incorporated across studies. Poor reporting was noted, with 14 studies (18%) not defining how days at home was operationalized and 18 studies (23%) not reporting how death was handled. Construct and criterion validity were demonstrated across seven validation studies in different surgical populations.

conclusionDays at home after surgery is a robust, flexible, and validated outcome measure that is being increasingly used as a patient-centred metric after surgery. With growing use, there is also growing variability in terms used, definitions applied, and reporting standards. This review summarizes these findings to work towards coordinating and standardizing the use of days at home after surgery as a patient-centred policy and research tool.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID39656657
PMCPMC11630023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.