Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656430›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Establishment of multiple machine learning prognostic model for gene differences between primary tumors and lymph nodes in luminal breast cancer.

Meng Yue, Jianing Zhao, Si Wu, Lijing Cai, Xinran Wang, Ying Jia, Xiaoxiao Wang, Yongjun Wang, Yueping Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meng YueDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Jianing ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Si WuDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Lijing CaiDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Xinran WangDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Ying JiaDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Xiaoxiao WangDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Yueping LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. liuyp@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Medical Development Foundation KC2022-ZZ0091-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to explore the correlation between primary tumors (PT) and paired metastatic lymph nodes (LN) and to develop a predictive model to provide evidence for forecasting patient prognoses.

methodsWe obtained single-cell and bulk transcriptome data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Furthermore, mRNA transcriptomic data, encompassing 112 normal tissues and 1066 breast cancer samples, along with survival, clinical, and mutation information for breast cancer patients, were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Employing a machine learning integration framework incorporating ten distinct algorithms, we developed and validated a prognostic model.

resultsWe constructed a prognostic model named Lymph Node Metastasis-Related Scores (LMRS) using 26 differentially expressed genes trained on eight TCGA datasets. Across validation sets, the model demonstrated a high C-index, signifying its stability and effectiveness, outperforming 64 models from other studies. Notably, cytolytic activity and T cell co-stimulation were downregulated in the high LMRS group, alongside a downregulation of immune cells, including B cells, CD8 + T cells, iDCs, and TILs. Similarly, most immune checkpoints exhibited a decreasing trend with high LMRS expression. Finally, we selected the hub biomarkers PGK1 and HSP90 for pathological verification. Results indicated higher expression levels in PT and LN compared to normal and benign tumors, with higher expression levels in LN than in PT.

conclusionThis comprehensive analysis sheds light on gene expression differences between PT and LN in breast cancer, culminating in the development of a multiple-gene prognostic model with high clinical accuracy for prognosis prediction.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsLymph NodesMachine LearningDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBreast cancerLymph nodesMachine learningTransciptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.