ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Establishment of multiple machine learning prognostic model for gene differences between primary tumors and lymph nodes in luminal breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating single-cell RNA and bulk RNA sequencing data to identify prognostic genes associated with pyrimidine metabolism in triple-negative breast cancer by machine learning algorithm combinations.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Recognition of molecular clusters and a novel prognostic signature based on natural killer cell-related genes in skin cutaneous melanoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the correlation between primary tumors (PT) and paired metastatic lymph nodes (LN) and to develop a predictive model to provide evidence for forecasting patient prognoses.
methodsWe obtained single-cell and bulk transcriptome data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Furthermore, mRNA transcriptomic data, encompassing 112 normal tissues and 1066 breast cancer samples, along with survival, clinical, and mutation information for breast cancer patients, were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Employing a machine learning integration framework incorporating ten distinct algorithms, we developed and validated a prognostic model.
resultsWe constructed a prognostic model named Lymph Node Metastasis-Related Scores (LMRS) using 26 differentially expressed genes trained on eight TCGA datasets. Across validation sets, the model demonstrated a high C-index, signifying its stability and effectiveness, outperforming 64 models from other studies. Notably, cytolytic activity and T cell co-stimulation were downregulated in the high LMRS group, alongside a downregulation of immune cells, including B cells, CD8 + T cells, iDCs, and TILs. Similarly, most immune checkpoints exhibited a decreasing trend with high LMRS expression. Finally, we selected the hub biomarkers PGK1 and HSP90 for pathological verification. Results indicated higher expression levels in PT and LN compared to normal and benign tumors, with higher expression levels in LN than in PT.
conclusionThis comprehensive analysis sheds light on gene expression differences between PT and LN in breast cancer, culminating in the development of a multiple-gene prognostic model with high clinical accuracy for prognosis prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.