Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656426›Full record

SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2025

Multi-Omics Biomarkers for Predicting Efficacy of Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.

Liru Chen, Chuhan Zhang, Ruixuan Niu, Shanshan Xiong, Jinshen He, Yu Wang, Pingxin Zhang, Fengyuan Su, Zishan Liu, Longyuan Zhou and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. From AI-AssistedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Liru ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2788-1703
Chuhan ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruixuan NiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shanshan XiongDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinshen HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-5243
Yu WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Pingxin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fengyuan SuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zishan LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-7397
Longyuan ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ren MaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shixian HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Minhu ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yun QiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Rui FengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-2147

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2507300National Natural Science Foundation of China 82270579National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370551Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2024GXNSFFA010009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneity and suboptimal efficacy of biological treatments and small molecule drugs necessitate their precise selection based on biomarkers that predict therapeutic responses in inflammatory bowel disease. Recent studies have identified numerous novel biomarkers predictive of responses to biologics and small molecule modulators, utilizing a variety of omics approaches in inflammatory bowel disease. In this review, we systematically examine baseline omics biomarkers that predict responses to biological therapies and small molecule drugs, drawing on literature from PubMed. Our analysis spans multiple omics disciplines, including genomics, transcriptomics (both bulk RNA and single-cell RNA sequencing), proteomics, microbiomics, and metabolomics, with particular emphasis on the impact of models integrating multiple omics datasets. Additionally, to further the field of precision medicine, we evaluated specific biomarkers that may exhibit distinct effects on responses to multiple therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdultBiomarkersGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsMultiomicsPrecision MedicineProteomicsTranscriptomeTreatment OutcomeBiological ProductsBiomarkersadalimumabcertolizumabCrohn's diseaseinflammatory bowel diseaseinfliximabprecision medicinetofacitinibulcerative colitisustekinumabvedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39656426
PMCPMC12090831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.