ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Inadequate identification of high cardiovascular risk and carotid plaques in rheumatoid arthritis patients by the 2024 Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular EVENTs and the 2013 Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease algorithms: findings from a Mexican cohort.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carotid Atherosclerosis and T-Cell Imbalance in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Intima-Media Thickness, Anti-CCP Antibodies and CD4/CD8 Ratio.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association introduced the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular EVENTs (PREVENT™) algorithm to estimate the 10-year risk of developing cardiovascular disease. We aimed to assess the cardiovascular risk (CVR) reclassification among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using traditional CVR algorithms-the 2024 PREVENT™ and the 2013 Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)-and the presence of carotid plaque (CP). This was a cross-sectional study nested of a RA patients' cohort. A certified radiologist performed a high-resolution B-mode carotid ultrasound to identify the presence of CP. The CVR evaluation was performed by a cardiologist, blinded to carotid ultrasound results, using the PREVENT™ and the ASCVD algorithms. Cohen's kappa (k) coefficient assessed concordance between high-risk classification by CVR algorithms and CP presence. ROC curve analysis evaluated the algorithms' capacity to identify RA patients with CP. The cutoff point was determined by the Youden-Index, with p < 0.05 as statistically significant. A total of 210 RA patients were included. The reclassification of CVR due to CP was 34.3% for the PREVENT™ algorithm and 30.0% for the ASCVD algorithm. Of these, 44.4% and 71.4%, respectively, were initially classified as low risk. Concordance between CVR algorithms and carotid ultrasound showed slight agreement (k = 0.032 and k = 0.130, respectively). The PREVENT™ algorithm did not identify more than one-third of high-CVR RA patients with indication of starting statin therapy based on carotid ultrasound findings. The PREVENT™ and ASCVD algorithms showed poor performance in identifying RA patients with CP. Key Points • The presence of CP was identified in more than a third of the evaluated RA patients (35.7%), classifying them as high CVR. • CVR reclassification by the presence of CP was observed in 34.3% RA patients with the PREVENTTM algorithm and in 30.0% RA patients with the ASCVD algorithm. • Most of the reclassified patients belonged to the low-risk category, 44.4% with the PREVENTTM algorithm and 71.4% with the ASCVD algorithm. • When evaluating the concordance between the ASCVD algorithm and the carotid ultrasound for high-risk classification, a slight agreement was found (k = 0.130).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.