Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656331›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024

Special Considerations in the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Deborah I Friedman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Deborah I FriedmanYellow Rose Headache and Neuro-Ophthalmology, 12740 Hillcrest Road, Suite 269, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA. neuroeye@tx.rr.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-6158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review the management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) with co-existing conditions affecting therapy: obesity, sulfa allergy, nephrolithiasis, and pregnancy. RECENT

findingsThe IIH-WT trial showed that bariatric surgery is currently the most effective method for obese patients with IIH to lose weight, leading to normalization of CSF pressure in many cases. Allergy to sulfonamide antibiotics does not preclude the use of acetazolamide; rather, penicillin allergy or multiple drug allergies are the strongest predictor of a hypersensitivity reaction. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors should be avoided in individuals with a personal history of nephrolithiasis; the risk of renal stones increases with concomitant use of other medications with the potential for nephrolithiasis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1RA) are promising non-surgical weight loss options although preliminary studies have not demonstrated considerable impact on papilledema, headache or vision. Women with IIH have high rates of pregnancy complications partly related to obesity. Recommendations for weight gain or loss during gestation are controversial. Recent studies show better outcomes in obese women who maintain or lose weight while pregnant including gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and emergency caesarian section. Progress continues in the search for the cause and best treatments for IIH. Larger multicenter trials of GLP-1RA are needed to determine their efficacy.

Indexed as

ObesityPseudotumor CerebriBariatric SurgeryFemaleHumansNephrolithiasisPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsCarbonic anhydrase inhibitorsGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonistsIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionNephrolithiasisObesity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.