ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024
Special Considerations in the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of bariatric surgery and community weight management for idiopathic intracranial hypertension in a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Acetazolamide for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review in 2025.Eye and brain · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Subgroup-Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ASIDE internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review the management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) with co-existing conditions affecting therapy: obesity, sulfa allergy, nephrolithiasis, and pregnancy. RECENT
findingsThe IIH-WT trial showed that bariatric surgery is currently the most effective method for obese patients with IIH to lose weight, leading to normalization of CSF pressure in many cases. Allergy to sulfonamide antibiotics does not preclude the use of acetazolamide; rather, penicillin allergy or multiple drug allergies are the strongest predictor of a hypersensitivity reaction. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors should be avoided in individuals with a personal history of nephrolithiasis; the risk of renal stones increases with concomitant use of other medications with the potential for nephrolithiasis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1RA) are promising non-surgical weight loss options although preliminary studies have not demonstrated considerable impact on papilledema, headache or vision. Women with IIH have high rates of pregnancy complications partly related to obesity. Recommendations for weight gain or loss during gestation are controversial. Recent studies show better outcomes in obese women who maintain or lose weight while pregnant including gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and emergency caesarian section. Progress continues in the search for the cause and best treatments for IIH. Larger multicenter trials of GLP-1RA are needed to determine their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.