ReviewHeart failure reviews2025
Machine learning in predicting heart failure survival: a review of current models and future prospects.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic models in populations with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced prediction of coronary heart disease risk in diabetic patients via Machine learning incorporating multiple inflammatory and metabolic indices: A study with Dual-Cohort validation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning-driven identification of heart failure biomarkers: a multi-model feature selection approach with SHAP-based interpretability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning predicts ICU mortality in cardiogenic shock: interpreting SOFA, lactate, and pH thresholds.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- A Unified Framework for Survival Prediction: Combining Machine Learning Feature Selection with Traditional Survival Analysis in Heart Failure and METABRIC Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of 1-year mortality in older patients with heart failure: a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying risk factors for vasculogenic etiology in patients with erectile dysfunction based on clinical features and machine learning.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative delirium of elderly patients with coronary heart disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Cardiac Rupture After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Development of a Risk Prediction Model.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Toxicity Prediction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Toxics · 2025Review
- Predicting major adverse cardiac events in diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a machine learning study from the Silesia Diabetes-Heart Project.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Machine learning prediction and SHAP interpretability analysis of heart failure risk in patients with hyperuricemia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure is a complex and prevalent condition with significant implications for patient management and survival prediction. Traditional predictive models often fall short in accuracy due to their reliance on pre-specified predictors and assumptions of variable independence. This review aims to assess the role of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting heart failure survival, comparing their performance with traditional statistical methods and identifying key predictive features. We conducted a review of studies utilizing ML algorithms for heart failure survival prediction. Data were sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Embase, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published until July 2024. A total of 10 studies were reviewed, encompassing 468,171 patients with heart failure. ML algorithms, particularly random forests and gradient boosting methods, demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional statistical models. These algorithms effectively identified key risk factors and stratified patients into risk categories with high accuracy. Notably, extreme learning machine (ELM) and CatBoost models showed exceptional predictive capabilities, as indicated by metrics such as Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC). Key predictive features included ejection fraction (EF), serum creatinine (S Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). ML algorithms offer significant advantages in predicting heart failure survival by uncovering complex patterns and improving risk stratification. Their integration into clinical practice could lead to more personalized treatment strategies and enhanced patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data quality, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.