Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656307›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Coelimycin inside out - negative feedback regulation by its intracellular precursors.

Magdalena Kotowska, Mateusz Wenecki, Bartosz Bednarz, Jarosław Ciekot, Wojciech Pasławski, Tomasz Buhl, Krzysztof J Pawlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena KotowskaHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-114, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5000-454X
Mateusz WeneckiHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-114, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-0102
Bartosz BednarzFaculty of Biotechnology, Laboratory of Biological Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, Fryderyka Joliot-Curie 14a, 50-383, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-5868
Jarosław CiekotHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-114, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-2338
Wojciech PasławskiLaboratory of Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-4547
Tomasz BuhlHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-114, Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof J PawlikHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-114, Wroclaw, Poland. krzysztof.pawlik@hirszfeld.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-9292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coelimycin (CPK) producer Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) is a well-established model for the genetic studies of bacteria from the genus Streptomyces, renowned for their ability to produce a plethora of antibiotics and other secondary metabolites. Expression regulation of natural product biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) is highly complex, involving not only regulatory proteins, like transcription factors, but also the products of the biosynthetic pathway that may act as ligands for some regulators and modulate their activity. Here, we present the evidence that intracellular CPK precursor(s) (preCPK) is involved in a negative feedback loop repressing the CPK BGC. Moreover, we provide a characterization of the cluster-encoded efflux pump CpkF. We show that CpkF is essential for the extracellular CPK production. In order to track down which CPK compounds - intra- or extracellular - are the ones responsible for the feedback signal, a luciferase-based reporter system was applied to compare the activity of 13 CPK gene promoters in the wild-type (WT) and two mutated strains. The first strain, lacking the CPK-specific exporter CpkF (ΔcpkF), was unable to produce the extracellular CPK. The second one did not produce any CPK at all, due to the disruption of the CpkC polyketide synthase subunit (ΔcpkC). All tested promoters were strongly upregulated in ΔcpkC strain, while in the ΔcpkF strain, promoter activity resembled the one of WT. These results lead to the conclusion that the CPK polyketide acts as a silencer of its own production. Supposedly this function is exerted via binding of the preCPK by an unidentified regulatory protein. KEY POINTS: •Intracellular coelimycin precursor takes part in a negative cpk cluster regulation •CpkF exporter is essential for the extracellular coelimycin production •Simple method for the analysis of coelimycin P2 production in agar medium.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMultigene FamilyStreptomyces coelicolorAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBiosynthetic PathwaysPromoter Regions, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsMajor facilitator superfamilyPolyketideRegulationReporter systemSecondary metabolismStreptomyces coelicolor

Identifiers

PMID39656307
PMCPMC11632069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.