Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656294›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Toxicity profile and clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost without fiducials or perirectal hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer.

Yuichiro Tsurugai, Atsuya Takeda, Naoko Sanuki, Yousuke Aoki, Yuto Kimura, Yohei Oku, Tomohiro Eriguchi, Hiroyuki Yamanaka, Maiko Machida, Tomohiko Matsushita and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuichiro TsurugaiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. tatesen2000@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-2000
Atsuya TakedaDepartment of of Radiation Oncology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko SanukiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yousuke AokiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuto KimuraRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yohei OkuRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomohiro EriguchiDepartment of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroyuki YamanakaDepartment of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Maiko MachidaDepartment of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomohiko MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shiro SaitoDepartment of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhole-prostate dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) can improve oncological outcomes, albeit at the cost of increased toxicity. A focal boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is gaining interest as an alternative approach. Herein, we investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients with localized PCa who underwent five-fraction SBRT with a focal boost to the DIL at our institution between May 2016 and August 2021. The prescription doses to the whole prostate were 35 and 36.25 Gy for low- to favorable intermediate-risk PCa and unfavorable intermediate- to high-risk PCa, respectively. The focal boost to the DIL was up to 115-140% of the prescribed dose. None of the patients underwent pretreatment fiducial or perirectal hydrogel spacer placement. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and oncological outcomes were assessed.

resultsAmong the 520 patients, 44% were categorized as patients with high-risk PCa. The median follow-up period was 42.9 months. No acute or late grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were observed in 22.3 and 6.1%, respectively, while GI toxicities were observed in 2.1 and 0.8% of the patients. The 4‑year relapse-free survival rate was 94.8% among all patients.

conclusionOur results indicate that SBRT with a focal boost without fiducials or perirectal hydrogel spacer for localized PCa has a promising toxicity profile and oncological outcomes. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to adequately evaluate late toxicities and efficacy.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overDose Fractionation, RadiationFiducial MarkersHumansHydrogelsMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHydrogelsFocal boostProstate cancerStereotactic body radiotherapyToxicities profile

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.