ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025
Toxicity profile and clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost without fiducials or perirectal hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- External beam focal boost radiotherapy to intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: a scoping review.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET and multiparametric MRI for gross tumour volume definition in localised and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with image-guided radiotherapy.Current opinion in urology · 2025Review
- Narrative review of focal boost to intraprostatic dominant lesion in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhole-prostate dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) can improve oncological outcomes, albeit at the cost of increased toxicity. A focal boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is gaining interest as an alternative approach. Herein, we investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients with localized PCa who underwent five-fraction SBRT with a focal boost to the DIL at our institution between May 2016 and August 2021. The prescription doses to the whole prostate were 35 and 36.25 Gy for low- to favorable intermediate-risk PCa and unfavorable intermediate- to high-risk PCa, respectively. The focal boost to the DIL was up to 115-140% of the prescribed dose. None of the patients underwent pretreatment fiducial or perirectal hydrogel spacer placement. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and oncological outcomes were assessed.
resultsAmong the 520 patients, 44% were categorized as patients with high-risk PCa. The median follow-up period was 42.9 months. No acute or late grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were observed in 22.3 and 6.1%, respectively, while GI toxicities were observed in 2.1 and 0.8% of the patients. The 4‑year relapse-free survival rate was 94.8% among all patients.
conclusionOur results indicate that SBRT with a focal boost without fiducials or perirectal hydrogel spacer for localized PCa has a promising toxicity profile and oncological outcomes. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to adequately evaluate late toxicities and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.