ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Impact of repeated intranasal gentamicin irrigation on auditory brainstem evoked potentials in rats.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Auditory Brainstem Responses of Two Rat Models of Autism: Environmental and Genetic Contributions to Autism-Like Auditory Function.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Article
- Impact of repeated intranasal gentamicin irrigation on structure and function of the vestibular brainstem.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gentamicin is a bactericidal aminoglycoside antibiotic that broadly targets Gram-negative microbes. Both human and animal studies have shown that administration of gentamicin is ototoxic by several routes of administration and results in sensorineural hearing loss due to damaged hair cell at the base of the cochlea. However, gentamicin is also administered intranasally to treat sinusitis in humans, but no animal studies have examined ototoxicity of gentamicin administered via this route. We hypothesized that intranasal irrigation of gentamicin will result in ototoxicity and impaired auditory function similar to systemic delivery. We investigated this hypothesis in Sprague-Dawley rats that received intranasal irrigations of gentamicin or saline from postnatal day (P) 21-31. We examined auditory function by assessing brainstem auditory evoked potentials in response to both broadband clicks and pure tone-pips (4, 8, 16, 24 and 32 kHz) on P41. We found significant changes in auditory function in gentamicin-exposed animals. Specifically, gentamicin-exposed animals had significantly higher thresholds in response to both clicks and tone-pips. In response to broadband clicks, there were no changes in latency for waves I through IV. However, we found significantly longer wave and interwave latencies for all waves in response to the 24 kHz tone-pip. Together, these findings suggest that intranasal administration of gentamicin results in impaired auditory function consistent with other routes of delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.