Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656199›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2024

Testing the acceptability and feasibility of the lower-risk gambling guidelines in Finland.

Jussi Palomäki, Tiina Latvala, Anne H Salonen, Virve Marionneau, David Hodgins, Matthew M Young, Sari Castrén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jussi Palomäki1Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6063-0926
Tiina Latvala1Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-386X
Anne H Salonen1Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4693-0110
Virve Marionneau6Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Research on Addiction, Control, and Governance, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2476-5094
David Hodgins7Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-5200
Matthew M Young8Greo Evidence Insights, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-4678
Sari Castrén1Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0492-9610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The lower risk gambling guidelines (LRGG) represent an evidence-based collaborative effort to provide clear advice to people on the limits of safe gambling consumption. The guidelines are as follows: 1) Gamble no more than 1% of household income per month; and 2) Gamble no more than 4 days per month; and 3) Avoid regularly gambling at more than 2 types of games. Methods: In an online survey study (N = 778), we evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the LRGG among different subpopulations in Finland. Results: We found that the guidelines were generally evaluated positively as understandable, sensible, clear, and "just right" in terms of their content. There were some notable differences between subpopulations: Individuals who were at risk of gambling problems evaluated the LRGG more negatively than others, while professionals working in the field of gambling prevention were the most optimistic about the guidelines. Thus, increased level of potentially harmful gambling engagement was linked with a somewhat more pessimistic attitude towards the guidelines. On the other hand, those who had not gambled in the past year viewed the guidelines as too permissive compared with those who had gambled, or those working in gambling prevention. Discussion: Overall, our results show clear differences of opinion between the various subpopulations, which appear to be associated with the individuals' level and nature of gambling experience. We conclude that the LRGG can likely be adopted into wider use in Finland.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesGamblingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFinlandGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultacceptabilityfeasibilitylower-risk gambling limitspreventionproblem gamblingrisk curves

Identifiers

PMID39656199
PMCPMC11737407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.